Area 51 » Technology

170

followers

Announcements

Signal, Image & Video Processing now has 100% in total committers and for committers with 200+ rep. Please re-comit to up the third commitment score. – Peter K. Aug 2 '11 at 0:06

We made it! = ) – Phonon Aug 12 '11 at 21:10

This proposal is now in the Beta phase — example questions are locked!

59 Example Questions (11 closed)

active oldest votes

up vote 2 down vote

added by T Powers Nov 13 '10 at 10:53

up vote 1 down vote

added by Nik Reiman Jun 2 '10 at 8:10

Far too entry-level, imo – Nik Reiman Jun 3 '10 at 11:49

up vote 1 down vote

added by Ben Gartner Jun 16 '10 at 23:26

up vote 1 down vote

added by msutherl Jul 11 '10 at 5:41

closed as off topic by Marty, Studer, DarenW, Jim A, Mark Borgerding Aug 30 '10 at 17:17

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/869/… – endolith Oct 18 '10 at 19:11

up vote 1 down vote

added by BCS Sep 9 '10 at 0:37

	This belongs on electronics.stackexchange.com – endolith Oct 18 '10 at 19:01
	@endolith: While I agree that electronics.* is an excellent place for this question the only way I see it could be off topic here is if analog implementation of signal processing are off topic. If so, the description needs to be adjusted accordingly. – BCS Oct 19 '10 at 1:10
	There's going to be some overlap between electronics., dsp., and stackoverflow. We need to clarify which things belong on which sites. – endolith Oct 27 '10 at 14:57

up vote 1 down vote

added by endolith Oct 18 '10 at 18:56

stackoverflow.com/questions/1120422/… – endolith Oct 18 '10 at 18:56

up vote 1 down vote

added by endolith Oct 18 '10 at 18:58

stackoverflow.com/questions/1100100/… – endolith Oct 18 '10 at 18:58

up vote 0 down vote

added by Peter K. Jun 2 '10 at 1:07

closed as off topic by Lance Roberts, Adam Davis, eryksun, Nik Reiman, Danny Jul 9 '10 at 17:32

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

If you're doing signal processing, you're in 3 camps: theory, practice, and design; software implementation; and processing hardware (e.g. FPGAs, DSPs, microcontrollers). Forcing a divide provides some semblance of organization to make it easier to find interesting questions to answer. The more tags you have (e.g. because the topic definition is too general), the more questions you'll have that are improperly or vaguely tagged. – eryksun Jun 23 '10 at 20:28

up vote 0 down vote

added by Peter K. Jun 2 '10 at 1:07

closed as off topic by Adam Davis, eryksun, Nik Reiman, msutherl, morfu Aug 22 '10 at 11:40

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

Apparently code is OK on this site. Every other proposal is being very strict about confining such questions to StackOverflow. – Robert Harvey Jun 3 '10 at 3:19

I think Signal Processing could be different. A lot of Signal Processing people write code to test an algorithm out, and do not really care about the art of programming. – earlNameless Jun 18 '10 at 15:20

Signal processing is information theory, communication & control systems, random processes, etc. If I have a problem coding a discrete-time system, I'll take it to StackOverflow. – eryksun Jun 23 '10 at 20:08

up vote 0 down vote

added by Lance Roberts Jun 2 '10 at 5:33

closed as off topic by Nik Reiman, Adam Davis, Willbill, Drazick, eryksun Jun 23 '10 at 20:45

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

electronics.stackexchange.com – endolith Oct 18 '10 at 19:02

up vote 0 down vote

added by msutherl Jul 11 '10 at 5:37

closed as off topic by Marty, igor b., Peter K., moala, Mild Fuzz Nov 1 '10 at 18:31

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

off-topic: would be on topic but too subjective in area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/20203/… – moala Oct 18 '10 at 15:23

up vote 0 down vote

added by Figaro Aug 12 '10 at 13:15

(IMU = Inertial Measurement Unit. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_measurement_unit) – WikiSpeedia hang-around Aug 22 '10 at 13:51

up vote 0 down vote

added by Mark Borgerding Aug 30 '10 at 17:14

up vote 0 down vote

added by Mark Borgerding Aug 30 '10 at 17:15

I think this exemplary question is too basic. Googling "site:en.wikipedia.org OFDM" the top hit is the answer, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… – WikiSpeedia hang-around Sep 28 '10 at 13:41

up vote 0 down vote

added by Jacob Sep 23 '10 at 19:40

up vote 0 down vote

added by endolith, edited by WikiSpeedia hang-around Nov 19 '10 at 20:42

stackoverflow.com/questions/1787536/… – endolith Oct 18 '10 at 18:55

up vote 0 down vote

added by T Powers Nov 13 '10 at 10:40

up vote 0 down vote

added by T Powers Nov 13 '10 at 10:42

up vote 0 down vote

added by T Powers Nov 13 '10 at 10:44

up vote 0 down vote

added by Pearsonartphoto Dec 16 '10 at 13:59

up vote 0 down vote

added by Garan Dec 21 '10 at 4:38

up vote 0 down vote

added by Garan Dec 21 '10 at 7:13

up vote -1 down vote

added by Mark Borgerding Aug 30 '10 at 17:10

closed as off topic by Mild Fuzz, T Powers, Stéphane Péchard, Jason, Garan Dec 21 '10 at 4:17

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

This message is just random, it doesn't really help show what this form is and isn't, just that it's not a place for random software that might not be related to DSP – Pearsonartphoto Dec 16 '10 at 13:57

up vote -1 down vote

added by runexe Sep 27 '10 at 14:47

First question is a bit too basic (I think any definition-kind of question that you can look up from Wikipedia does not belong in Stack Exchange family, in general), the second one is very good. – Geoffrey Zheng Sep 28 '10 at 13:26

up vote -2 down vote

added by matias.valdenegro, edited by WikiSpeedia hang-around Jul 13 '10 at 22:55

	Too broad. More appropriate for a wiki – Mark Borgerding Aug 30 '10 at 17:17
	It's broad, but it's not off topic. – Mild Fuzz Nov 1 '10 at 18:31

up vote -3 down vote

added by Peter K. Jun 2 '10 at 1:14

closed as off topic by Nik Reiman, Lance Roberts, Doresoom, Paul R, Adam Davis Jun 15 '10 at 21:29

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

This just doesn't help to show what this community is at all... – Pearsonartphoto Dec 16 '10 at 14:02

up vote -3 down vote

added by Michael, edited by WikiSpeedia hang-around Aug 22 '10 at 13:52

I think the first part (what is Fourier) would be too basic for this site. The second part (how do you apply it to audio) would be a good question because it focuses on the application of the Fourier Transform in the real world which might not be apparent from the math. – earlNameless Jul 20 '10 at 2:08

up vote -6 down vote

added by Mark Borgerding Aug 30 '10 at 17:06

closed as off topic by BCS, Geoffrey Zheng, hotpaw2, runexe, igor b. Sep 24 '10 at 23:46

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

Off topic questions must be related to the site, an must be those questions that we expect been posted by some users. I think this is not a good example. – Edgar Nov 25 '10 at 0:19

This is more related to stackoverflow than signal processing. – Ned Nov 29 '10 at 18:46