Area 51 » Krazer

May 2	awarded	● Citizen Patrol
Apr 10	awarded	● Editor
Apr 10	comment	Klingon Language & Usage: When using <-moH> on a verb that already has an object. How do you indicate both objects? What order should they be marked and stated in?" thanks for the clarification.
Apr 10	revised	Klingon Language & Usage: When using <-moH> on a verb that already has an object. How do you indicate both objects? What order should they be marked and stated in?" edited title
Apr 10	comment	Klingon Language & Usage: When using <-moH> on a verb that already has an object. How do you indicate both objects? What order should they be marked and stated in?" I've revised my question. Given a phrase such as, "I cause you to form a plan," "plan" is the direct object, so you'd use "vI-", but then how would you indicate the "you?" At glance one might think to say something like "nab qachenmoH," but that's bad grammar, isn't it?
Apr 10	comment	Klingon Language & Usage: When using <-moH> on a verb that already has an object. How do you indicate both objects? What order should they be marked and stated in?" One of the major grammatical rules of the Klingon language is the Object-Verb-Subject sentence structure. I'm asking for how the sentence structure changes between sentences such as "cholegh'a" and "maghoSchoHmoHneS'a''
Apr 4	proposed question	Klingon Language & Usage: When using <-moH> on a verb that already has an object. How do you indicate both objects? What order should they be marked and stated in?"
Mar 15	awarded	● Advocate
Dec 21	awarded	● Upholder
Dec 5	awarded	● Pioneer