Area 51 » Technology

208

followers

This proposal is now in the Beta phase — example questions are locked!

115 Example Questions (7 closed)

active newest votes

up vote -1 down vote

added by mousetail Nov 18 '22 at 13:37

This could be improved by changing from "why" to "when" – warren Dec 5 '22 at 16:55

@warren thanks, good tip – mousetail Dec 5 '22 at 17:12

I removed my downvote. If this gets closed, I'll nominate for reopening – warren Dec 5 '22 at 21:30

up vote -1 down vote

added by BoppreH Nov 18 '22 at 18:23

I don't understand the close votes here. There are obviously different things that a shell language should consider. – Nathan Merrill Nov 18 '22 at 21:23

This is too vague, as there are many different possibilities – Seggan Nov 19 '22 at 14:34

"different" from ... what? An esoteric language like ws? A compiled language like Fortran? "different" in what way(s)? Powershell famously gives access to the .NET framework, for example, but in scriptable form – warren Nov 23 '22 at 13:11

@Nathan Merrill maybe it's not as obvious as you think – warren Dec 1 '22 at 13:49

I still disagree here. Shell languages do have unique considerations because they focus on executing other commands. You want to optimize how easy it is to copy/paste a console command into your shell language, for example. Fundmentally, I think the question of "I want to do X well. What considerations are there in this space?" is a great question. – Nathan Merrill Dec 1 '22 at 19:42

up vote -1 down vote

added by bigyihsuan Nov 18 '22 at 19:27

up vote -1 down vote

added by finnw Nov 22 '22 at 22:52

Actually, the internal string representation in Python and JS is often chosen dynamically, though it isn’t exposed to user code. So the premise behind the question seems false. – user3840170 Nov 23 '22 at 17:02

up vote -1 down vote

added by Robert Columbia Nov 23 '22 at 17:25

I’m not sure if this question makes sense to ask as written here, but slight rephrasings of it may be fruitful (for example, when designing a language with the goal of it not being Turing complete). – user3840170 Nov 26 '22 at 10:37

I think being able to say your language is Turing complete is mainly a marketing thing - people want to know whether your language can do X, and you can tell them "yes, it can do everything every other Turing complete language can". In practice being Turing complete is not really a good indicator of how expressive the language is, but some people like to know about it (either because it's the bare minimum they expect from a language, or because they find it interesting that a non-programming language like CSS3 is Turing complete.) I don't know if that makes the question suitable or not. – kaya3 Dec 3 '22 at 9:35

May be better worded, "when is it OK for a language to not be Turing Complete"? – warren Dec 12 '22 at 17:53

@warren that would be even more subjective – mousetail Jan 7 '23 at 16:25

@mousetail - perhaps. – warren Jan 9 '23 at 18:42

show 2 more improvement suggestions

up vote -1 down vote

added by Hg0428, edited by warren Dec 5 '22 at 16:01

This seems a bit too wrapped up in other language design choices. – Unrelated String Nov 28 '22 at 4:00

"Best" is subjective. This would be better if it were purely about advantages/disadvantages, and probably if it were broken into smaller questions (like if the bodies of conditions/loops should be their own scopes, if function scoping should exist, etc.) – Redwolf Programs Nov 29 '22 at 19:48

Edited from the original "What is the best system to use for scoping? Should ifs have their own scope? What are the advantages/disadvantages of this?" to a generalized format. – warren Dec 5 '22 at 16:01

up vote -1 down vote

added by Philipp Dec 2 '22 at 13:15

probably better phrased positively: "How do you design a language so its compiler can tell whether or not a function is pure?", maybe? – cjquines Feb 5 '23 at 10:23

up vote -1 down vote

added by marcantonio Dec 5 '22 at 1:57

up vote -1 down vote

added by warren Dec 6 '22 at 21:20

up vote -1 down vote

added by Unrelated String Dec 11 '22 at 22:53

up vote -1 down vote

added by NaCl Dec 14 '22 at 18:37

This… sounds a little like a grammatical mistake unless you know that “compiler correctness” is a thing. Which might be why somebody downvoted this? – brendanzab Dec 15 '22 at 9:18

Rather than what it is, perhaps we could have a question about something specific that comes up when implementing such a compiler? – Original Original Original VI Jan 27 '23 at 1:32

The question is phrased this way since compiler correctness is a spectrum. I think it does make sense to ask what a suitable correctness criterion for a compiler is, rather than how to realize a correct compiler. These are two different pairs of shoes – NaCl Jan 27 '23 at 11:31

up vote -1 down vote

added by Ray Butterworth Dec 25 '22 at 16:31

up vote -1 down vote

added by Ray Butterworth Dec 25 '22 at 16:36

think question would be better with a clearer definition of "behind the curtain access". how is this different from being turing complete – cjquines Feb 5 '23 at 10:22

How does one fit a clearer definition into the remaining 12 characters? It's nothing to do with Turing. Being able to cast the pointer type in C is an example of something that can provide great efficiency but can also allow disastrous mistakes. Accessing the top bits of a floating point number to get the log of its magnitude works wonderfully, at least it does until the hardware changes. – Ray Butterworth Feb 5 '23 at 14:56

up vote -1 down vote

added by RedzGoose Jan 10 '23 at 8:25

"specify" is unclear. Are you talking about the absence of explicit mentions of type in the source code (non-manifest typing)? Or are you talking about the lack of compile-time type verification (dynamic typing)? It's entirely possible for type to be both inferred and static, as in Haskell-family languages. But in another sense, even Python "specifies" datatypes, in that values have types even if variables (names) don't. – Anonymous Jan 12 '23 at 19:33

up vote -2 down vote

added by Redwolf Programs Nov 17 '22 at 23:02

What is a complicated parser? – user3840170 Nov 19 '22 at 12:19

up vote -2 down vote

added by fess, edited by AAM111 Nov 25 '22 at 20:31

closed as not constructive by Ethan, Nij, curiousdannii, user3840170, Bubbler Nov 21 '22 at 6:12

This question is not a good fit to our Q&A format. We expect answers to generally involve facts, references, or specific expertise; this question will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion.

I think this needs to be more objective. It's more like a poll, while a good question for SE's format would be more like "what are the advantages of..." – Redwolf Programs Nov 18 '22 at 16:05

I edited the question to make it more objective, and voted to reopen. – AAM111 Nov 25 '22 at 20:31

up vote -2 down vote

added by fess Nov 18 '22 at 15:34

This could be an okay question, but not phrased like this. – user3840170 Nov 20 '22 at 7:12

up vote -2 down vote

added by themisir Nov 18 '22 at 18:21

up vote -2 down vote

added by bigyihsuan Nov 18 '22 at 19:56

	Questions containing ‘this’ in the title are usually poor ones. – user3840170 Nov 20 '22 at 7:10
	I've since changed it to a more general question about nestable unaries. – bigyihsuan Nov 20 '22 at 18:26

up vote -2 down vote

added by Jeremy Nov 18 '22 at 21:10

closed as not constructive by Nathan Merrill, Ethan, Mark, curiousdannii, James Risner Nov 20 '22 at 20:34

This could be improved by removing the reference to "guides". Additionally, I think there are really two questions in one here: What are the different GC algorithms, and how do runtimes work? – Nathan Merrill Nov 18 '22 at 21:22

up vote -2 down vote

added by TKirishima Nov 18 '22 at 23:20

What is a template string? – user3840170 Nov 19 '22 at 12:10

@user3840170 I think it's like f"" strings in python or ${} strings in javascript. Strings with a spot to insert expression in that will be evaluated at runtime. – mousetail Nov 19 '22 at 18:06

The point though is that this isn't necessarily a universally-understood term; it's specific to JavaScript. Terms like ‘interpolation’ or ‘formatting’ would be more language-agnostic. – user3840170 Nov 19 '22 at 18:21

I think template string is well understood to include the PHP, python etc. equivalents. – mousetail Nov 20 '22 at 12:06

formatting isn't that. String formatting: is "%d = %s". And as said by Mousetail, this term is also used in other programming languages such as PHP. – TKirishima Nov 20 '22 at 17:11

show 1 more improvement suggestion

up vote -2 down vote

added by mcneb10 Nov 19 '22 at 20:04

closed as not constructive by curiousdannii, Ethan, kaya3, Ginger, warren Dec 5 '22 at 16:00

up vote -2 down vote

added by James Risner Nov 23 '22 at 3:51

closed as not a real question by user3840170, Robert Columbia, Seggan, warren, double-beep Dec 15 '22 at 5:11

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form.

What does ‘perform most task like C’ mean? – user3840170 Nov 23 '22 at 17:00

General use, not limited in capabilities. I’m not sure the best way to phrase that. In other words, if brevity limits capabilities pull back a little. – James Risner Nov 23 '22 at 17:56

The phrasing of the question is unclear – Seggan Nov 23 '22 at 23:12

@JamesRisner much better – Seggan Nov 24 '22 at 1:02

@JamesRisner I think its just the fact that this question is vauge – Seggan Dec 1 '22 at 16:00

show 4 more improvement suggestions

up vote -2 down vote

added by Fmbalbuena Dec 21 '22 at 2:54

up vote -2 down vote

added by Ray Butterworth Dec 25 '22 at 16:19

This would definitely be closed as needing more focus on the actual site. – damryfbfnetsi Jan 12 '23 at 7:02

Why the down and close votes? FORTRAN decided complex numbers were part of the language, C decided that they should be handled by libraries. This question is asking about how such decisions are made when designing a language. – Ray Butterworth Jan 13 '23 at 21:38

up vote -2 down vote

added by stackprotector Jan 16 '23 at 18:12

Who is "I"? A language designer can safely assume whatever they want, or rather they record their assumptions as definitions; it's up to the language implementer to make it reality. – Ray Butterworth Jan 17 '23 at 22:21

up vote -3 down vote

added by Adám Nov 18 '22 at 13:35

Maybe asking about pros and cons makes the question more objectively answerable. Other than that, I think it's a perfectly fine question about the "design" or "developer experience" side of programming language design. – Bubbler Nov 21 '22 at 6:18

up vote -3 down vote

added by bigyihsuan Nov 18 '22 at 20:05

I think this one is too subjective. It depends on what syntactic sugar and the target platform of your language. – Seggan Nov 18 '22 at 20:19

I don't see how it can ever depend on the target platform, since the definition of "syntax sugar" is language syntax whose meaning is defined in terms of other language syntax, rather than whose meaning is defined directly. Syntax sugar can therefore be implemented by transforming the AST. Generally syntax sugar is used to decrease the implementation difficulty, since it allows you to have a richer syntax without creating more node types for the compiler backend to have to handle. – kaya3 Nov 19 '22 at 3:07

Sorry, I misunderstood the exact definition of syntax sugar. You are correct. However, my first argument still partially holds. – Seggan Nov 19 '22 at 14:36

define "syntactic sugar" - one man's core requirement is another woman's "nice to have" – warren Nov 21 '22 at 13:51

Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semicolon. – Robert Columbia Nov 23 '22 at 17:26

up vote -3 down vote

added by TKirishima Nov 18 '22 at 23:27

If you downvote this question, can you please explain why? – TKirishima Nov 20 '22 at 17:13

What is a SBCS? Sounds like more than one question? (If answered the answer would be long). – James Risner Dec 3 '22 at 18:27

(SBCS = single byte character set) – somebody Jan 28 '23 at 15:18

up vote -3 down vote

added by kouta-kun Nov 19 '22 at 19:48

up vote -3 down vote

added by justANewbie Dec 17 '22 at 5:45

	Why is this being downvoted? There are successful stack based language, FORTH being most notable, which are pretty interesting. Altho this question could use some more specificity (e.g., advantages for performance, or readability?), I think it is a good one – Redwolf Programs Jan 16 '23 at 0:48
	Is Python a stack-based language, or a not-stack-based language? CPython complies it down to a stack/register machine, but you could easily take out the register instructions. – wizzwizz4 Jan 29 '23 at 19:45

up vote -3 down vote

added by justANewbie Dec 17 '22 at 16:44

This seems more opinionated than having a constant answer type of question which can lead to discussion or argument. Depending on what the user is trying to get in the finale, the question can be asked in different ways: If they are asking about things such as usability when others use it, "What does your experience with the usability of a new language generally conclude to?" might fit. Then it is no longer asking for opinions but factual results. – leguchi Dec 18 '22 at 15:08

I was trying to create a question that look like this: softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/q/46716 – justANewbie Jan 16 '23 at 7:01

up vote -4 down vote

added by emanresu A Nov 17 '22 at 23:48

closed as duplicate of What are common ways to optimise an interpreted language? by Adám, Ginger, lyxal , warren, UndoneStudios Nov 18 '22 at 14:06

This question covers exactly the same ground as another question in this proposal.

You seem to have posted this question twice – mousetail Nov 18 '22 at 12:34

up vote -4 down vote

added by Adám Nov 21 '22 at 8:27

closed as not constructive by Ethan, curiousdannii, kaya3, finnw, Mark Nov 24 '22 at 2:47

This does not seem to be a question. If it is, please rephrase it so it sounds like one – Ethan Nov 21 '22 at 17:42

It’s a question, it’s just that it’s a question that will likely result in opinions. Which are generally off-topic here. – James Risner Nov 23 '22 at 17:58

@JamesRisner Isn't every question here opinion-based? – Adám Nov 23 '22 at 18:37

@Adám there are not supposed to be, no. Read area51.stackexchange.com/faq the "What makes a good question?" section – James Risner Nov 23 '22 at 23:04

The problem with this kind of opinion-based question is that it's not asking for expert opinions - "what reading materials do you recommend?" can be answered by everyone who has any reading materials to recommend, whereas a question like "what are the downsides of lazy evaluation?" can only get a good answer from someone who has expertise on that subject. A good subjective question requires expertise to answer; a bad subjective question can be answered by anyone with a personal opinion, and hence the answers won't likely be useful to a lot of people. – kaya3 Dec 2 '22 at 13:45

up vote -5 down vote

added by emanresu A Nov 17 '22 at 23:31

closed as off topic by curiousdannii, kaya3, warren, Mast, James Risner Nov 30 '22 at 20:44

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.

this has nothing to do with language design – warren Nov 21 '22 at 13:53

@warren disagree, this can feed back into the language design process - if a language's quirks make it hard to write a LSP server for example, one might choose between implementing a custom IDE or simplifying the language so that popular editors are better suited to it. – finnw Nov 23 '22 at 10:34