Area 51 » Technology

323

followers

Announcements

This site will allow anyone interested in QA at any level of experience ask any QA related questions from methodologies to tools. – Todd Bumbarger Jun 9 '10 at 17:13

So in other words, you want SO-like SQAforums? – Helen Jun 21 '10 at 17:40

There are two sites that could /potentially/ roll up with this site: testing.stackexchange.com and exchange.softwaretestingclub.com – Alan Sep 8 '10 at 3:48

show 10 more announcements

merged with Selenium Apr 26 '11 at 18:10

10 Closed Questions (show all)

active newest votes

up vote 2 down vote

added by Chris W. Rea Jun 3 '10 at 14:35

closed as off topic by alfredozn, Damien, Dave Hunt, Tester101, Todd Bumbarger Jul 19 '10 at 17:31

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

up vote 0 down vote

added by Gordon Gustafson Jul 4 '10 at 23:19

closed as off topic by Warren Pena, Alister Bulman, WikiSpeedia hang-around, Tester101, cometbill Jul 14 '10 at 13:06

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

up vote -1 down vote

added by John Nelson Jun 2 '10 at 16:44

closed as off topic by Chris W. Rea, Jessie, Peter K., Helen, alexanderpas Jun 16 '10 at 11:45

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

this question is too opinionated – John Nelson Jun 2 '10 at 16:45

I would agree with John. The tool itself is a matter of opinion and need. No one tool is 100% perfect and, depending upon your individual needs, one tool may be better than another. – TristaanOgre Jun 2 '10 at 17:36

up vote -1 down vote

added by John Nelson Jun 2 '10 at 17:18

closed as off topic by ascarb, Warren Pena, Andrew Андрей Листочкин, ancow, Shawn Chin Aug 11 '10 at 14:40

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

This one is too specific. General data reads from a variety of sources may be more in keeping with something of general interest. – TristaanOgre Jun 2 '10 at 17:37

I don't think you can be too specific, because if the question is specific it is more likely to have an answer. – John Nelson Jun 2 '10 at 18:12

up vote -2 down vote

added by glasnt Jun 3 '10 at 1:19

closed as off topic by John Nelson, Chris W. Rea, Steve Hook, Peter K., alexanderpas Jun 16 '10 at 11:45

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

I'd say that this is off-topic just because it is so open ended. Everyone will have their own opinion here. – Todd Bumbarger Jun 3 '10 at 13:07

up vote -4 down vote

added by John Nelson Jun 2 '10 at 16:59

closed as off topic by Chris W. Rea, Peter K., Jessie, Todd Bumbarger, alexanderpas Jun 16 '10 at 11:45

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

Question is too open ended. – John Nelson Jun 2 '10 at 17:00

This question should probably be in the FAQ on the site. – Anonymous Jun 3 '10 at 9:40

on-topic, but subjective meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/53919/… – Gordon Gustafson Jun 24 '10 at 0:26

I disagree with the majority here! If this site gets approved it will be a rare opportunity to explore these types of questions with a great group of contributors. This site will be a boom for SQA and SW Quality Engineering and needs to allow people to ask deep probing questions. Yes, this questions is broad and may not be that deep, but it should be asked, answered, and thought about continuously. – John Burley Jul 15 '10 at 14:50

@John Burley This site proposal is certainly a great opportunity to explore those questions. This question in particular is a question that will be too subjective and is not really grounded to any specific area of testing. I would be fine with a subjective question like "What is the best way to test scenario x". – Steve Hook Jul 15 '10 at 17:56

show 2 more improvement suggestions

up vote -4 down vote

added by Gelatin Jun 3 '10 at 1:22

closed as off topic by Chris W. Rea, Todd Bumbarger, Peter K., John Nelson, nccyber Jun 9 '10 at 18:14

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

My gut reaction is off-topic, simply because it's the kind of question with a situational answer. It represents that "It depends" group of questions. * IMO this site would be best served as a "Here's my very narrow testing problem, and here's what I'm doing to solve it. What am I doing wrong? How do I accomplish this?" – John Nelson Jun 3 '10 at 15:00

This is a business management question, not a testing question. – chills42 Jun 21 '10 at 15:43

Too vague. It might be an interesting question if it was accompanied with a lot of details about the situation. Other people could comment if they have experiences of outsourcing in similar situations. – Rikard Edgren Sep 16 '10 at 8:34

up vote -4 down vote

added by tonybruce Jun 9 '10 at 12:42

closed as off topic by Ilya Ryzhenkov, Gelatin, Jimmy C, chills42, Chris W. Rea Jun 23 '10 at 18:23

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

Obviously off-topic, this is basically a "do my homework" question. – chills42 Jun 21 '10 at 15:38

up vote -11 down vote

added by Chris W. Rea Jun 3 '10 at 14:34

closed as off topic by Jessie, Big GH, Steve Hook, chills42, ascarb Jun 22 '10 at 22:59

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

	(Just throwing this out there to see what happens with it ;-) – Chris W. Rea Jun 3 '10 at 14:34
	Inflammatory... it's not an us versus them... – TristaanOgre Jun 3 '10 at 15:06

up vote -14 down vote

added by Chris W. Rea Jun 3 '10 at 14:35

closed as off topic by John Nelson, Todd Bumbarger, Blorgbeard, Peter K., alexanderpas Jun 16 '10 at 11:46

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

Example of off-topic. I suggest this is off-topic for being inflammatory/argumentative - not to mention wrong! – Chris W. Rea Jun 3 '10 at 14:37

Yeah, it's just a bit too negative. – ascarb Jun 23 '10 at 19:35

Flame bait question :-) – Hakan Jul 12 '10 at 17:41

Aren't developers people who can't cut it as QA? If they could test effectively, why do they check-in code with bugs? But seriously, I'm not even sure this is even a question. It appears to me to be argumentative and looking for a flame war. – Adam Porad Jul 23 '10 at 15:56

Yup, it's flame-bait. Of course I disagree with the implied statement; I was simply putting this up as an example. But, I wasn't sure when I posted it if it would be "great off-topic" or "not a good example", and it seems based on the votes it is difficult to classify. – Chris W. Rea Jul 23 '10 at 17:19