Area 51 » Technology

The AI site didn't have enough activity during the beta, and has been closed. You can download the data dump of all questions here.

274

followers

70 Example Questions (2 closed)

active newest votes

up vote 10 down vote

added by Simon André Forsberg Nov 11 '13 at 12:43

up vote 8 down vote

added by Adrian Collado Oct 3 '13 at 14:04

This is a good question. Genetic programming is often used only on stationary environments. – Rob Lang Nov 25 '13 at 11:00

up vote 2 down vote

added by Maecky Aug 25 '13 at 15:41

up vote 2 down vote

added by user2883115 Oct 29 '13 at 12:28

up vote 1 down vote

added by Jarno Sep 9 '13 at 18:51

up vote 1 down vote

added by JDong Oct 20 '13 at 20:12

up vote 1 down vote

added by Bro Nov 8 '13 at 18:11

up vote 1 down vote

added by ljgw Nov 29 '13 at 21:22

up vote 0 down vote

added by Quonux Jul 28 '13 at 4:27

Seems to vague to me - is "context" a precise AI term? – BartoszKP Aug 17 '13 at 21:42

@BartoszKP: I believe this should be explained in actual body of the question. Example of such problem in real life - a big failure of military neural network for recognizing civilian vs military vehicles. Vehicles on green wall background are military, vehicles with horizon and sky in the background are civilian. – SF. Nov 21 '13 at 12:18

@SF Your example is nothing more than an example of either over-fitting, lack of representative data samples, or maybe poor classifier design. – BartoszKP Nov 25 '13 at 20:23

@BartoszKP: Teaching data samples with unintentional bias introduced by human error resulting from failing to understand how neural networks work. Two entities were producing the two data sets independently. The context of the photo - everything that was not the subject: background, lighting, camera settings - bore more meaning to the network than the actual subject (the vehicle). – SF. Dec 2 '13 at 8:48

up vote 0 down vote

added by e-sushi Jul 28 '13 at 11:37

up vote 0 down vote

added by nijansen Aug 25 '13 at 14:51

up vote 0 down vote

added by lejlot Aug 28 '13 at 15:29

up vote 0 down vote

added by Jarno Sep 9 '13 at 19:08

closed as not constructive by Robert Cartaino Nov 4 '13 at 13:39

This question is not a good fit to our Q&A format. We expect answers to generally involve facts, references, or specific expertise; this question will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion.

This seems as a very bad question. There is no good definition of "self-aware", nor "make AI self-aware" nor "effective way to ...". It is the same as asking "Is there any effective way to become a god?" when there is no "general" definition of the "god" entitity, nor any known way of becoming one – lejlot Oct 27 '13 at 10:00

Why was this upvoted? There is no way to answer this as this question would only lead to a discussion of the premises of the question. – JDong Oct 27 '13 at 20:31

up vote 0 down vote

added by BartoszKP Sep 28 '13 at 19:56

up vote 0 down vote

added by JDong Oct 3 '13 at 16:42

Good question! I'm out of up-votes unfortunately. – BartoszKP Nov 25 '13 at 20:24

up vote 0 down vote

added by Amber Oct 4 '13 at 13:52

up vote 0 down vote

added by Albert Oct 12 '13 at 11:40

I asked the full question on metaoptimize: metaoptimize.com/qa/questions/14170/… – Albert Oct 12 '13 at 12:08

If your question is not succinct enough to fit it in the text box without supplementary links, it isn't a good example question. – trav1s Oct 29 '13 at 7:16

up vote 0 down vote

added by user1612868 Nov 3 '13 at 16:01

Note: By "more natural", I mean "easier to implement." – user1612868 Nov 3 '13 at 16:02

up vote 0 down vote

added by nio Nov 3 '13 at 18:16

up vote 0 down vote

added by kdzia Nov 13 '13 at 8:19

up vote 0 down vote

added by Madhur Nov 22 '13 at 7:30

up vote 0 down vote

added by blunderboy Nov 23 '13 at 2:32

up vote 0 down vote

added by Rob Lang Nov 25 '13 at 10:59

up vote 0 down vote

added by Rob Lang Nov 25 '13 at 11:28

up vote 0 down vote

added by Fractaliste Nov 27 '13 at 21:44

up vote -1 down vote

added by Othman A.A., edited by e-sushi Oct 3 '13 at 19:37

@trav1s Indeed right, the question seems to have been edited though, the current question seems a lot better. – Simon André Forsberg Oct 18 '13 at 23:55

up vote -3 down vote

added by Othman A.A. Jul 24 '13 at 13:22

Questions that recommend tools are usually closed on Stack Exchange sites. They tend to attract opinions and spam, instead of facts. – S.L. Barth Jul 24 '13 at 14:15

On electronics.SE they are called shopping questions and they get downvoted and closed faster than anything. Even if you get helpful answers, the question is too localized. After a year or two the answers will all be out of date and no longer helpful. – trav1s Jul 25 '13 at 2:08