Stack Exchange
log in sign up chat discuss faq users badges

Area 51 » Science

definition commitment beta
156
followers

History of Science and Mathematics

Launched Q&A site for people interested in the history and origins of science and mathematics

43
votes
5
answers

What is the rationale for not allowing answers during the definition phase?

apr 8 '19 at 22:24 Henry WH Hack v3.0 2,735
13
votes
9
answers

Suggest a URL for this site

oct 16 '14 at 5:00 Community♦ 1
-4
votes
4
answers

Is “STEM History” a better name for this site?

oct 11 '14 at 15:15 Community♦ 1
6
votes
2
answers

Is Philosophy of Science on topic on History of Science and Mathematics?

oct 9 '14 at 10:50 Jack M 2,385
-14
votes
2
answers

Generalize the site

aug 27 '14 at 0:31 Jack M 2,385

show 14 more discussions
discuss this proposal

93 Example Questions

active newest votes
up vote 6 down vote
What are the objects of study and the methods of history of mathematics research?
added by MathsBooks Feb 21 '14 at 13:44
link
3  
This seems far too broad to get an accurate and authoritative answer. – Jonathan Van Matre Mar 22 '14 at 3:55
up vote 4 down vote
How old is the peer-review process in scientific publishing ?
added by User51 Mar 1 '14 at 10:02
link
This is a good question! – Andres Caicedo Apr 12 '14 at 17:45
up vote 3 down vote
Was Mendel lucky enough to select 7 different non-linked traits for his pea hybrid research, or is there evidence he studied and discarded others?
added by Jonathan Van Matre Mar 21 '14 at 15:48
link
up vote 3 down vote
Is there any evidence that the computer had been theorized by others prior to Charles Babbage's pioneering attempt to build a difference engine?
added by Jonathan Van Matre Mar 28 '14 at 4:56
link
up vote 2 down vote
Stillman Drake's "Impetus Theory Reappraised" (1975) and continuity: accepted, refuted, or still controversial?
added by Michael Weiss Feb 17 '14 at 17:47
link
This raises historical questions about early dynamics but also early notions of the limit concept, plus what was new in Galileo's work. – Michael Weiss Feb 17 '14 at 17:50
up vote 2 down vote
What exactly were Viete's concepts of Zetetic, Poristic, and Exegetic?
added by Brian Rushton Feb 19 '14 at 17:10
link
This is a canonical question, and a very natural response to reading Viète. In fact these might be the first three words that one would feel compelled to define in such an endeavor. – J. W. Perry Feb 21 '14 at 18:37
up vote 2 down vote
How did Staudinger demonstrate that polymers are high molecular weight covalently bonded molecules?
added by Colin McFaul Feb 25 '14 at 4:56
link
up vote 2 down vote
If making graphene was as easy as removing layers with scotch tape and it's structure was postulated for years, why was it so difficult to discover?
added by kaine Feb 27 '14 at 22:45
link
The body of the question would elaborate but graphene was discussed but deemed thermodynamically impossible for years before the "scotch tape" method was used to produce it from graphite. – kaine Feb 27 '14 at 22:47
up vote 2 down vote
How were the concepts of velocity and acceleration first separated? Were they even ever conflated in the literature?
added by BMS Mar 1 '14 at 2:09
link
up vote 2 down vote
What was the scientific understanding of biological evolution before Darwin's "Origin of Species?"
added by Colin McFaul Mar 7 '14 at 18:47
link
up vote 2 down vote
Is is true that the word 'mathematicians' meant what we now call 'astrologers'? Boas would even add that the modern meaning went back to around 1400.
added by J. H. S. Mar 10 '14 at 0:11
link
... How did Boas find that out? – J. H. S. Mar 10 '14 at 3:20
The mention of the date is interesting. Where does he say that? – Andres Caicedo Mar 10 '14 at 7:00
In a short note which he wrote for the Pi Mu Epsilon Journal... It all had to do with a famous quotation by Augustine of Hippo. – J. H. S. Mar 13 '14 at 0:40
Thank you. I'll have to look it up, I'm curious. – Andres Caicedo Mar 13 '14 at 1:46
up vote 1 down vote
What important mathematics by John Nash was classified by the NSA?
added by Rebecca J. Stones Feb 17 '14 at 1:10
link
up vote 1 down vote
What effect did the creation of patents have on the development of scientific instrumentation?
added by Colin McFaul Feb 18 '14 at 2:15
link
Your profile tells me you are clearly in the math/science club. I am just wondering how you justify questions on the history of patent laws as being capstone questions in the history of science or the history of mathematics. While I am not immediately seeing the fit, I am open minded to arguments. – J. W. Perry Feb 18 '14 at 8:21
Except for the market, patents affect science, technology and their development. – frabala Feb 18 '14 at 11:26
@frabala So does the paper industry. So do a lot of things. – Jack M Feb 18 '14 at 11:32
@J. W. Perry, I am trying to generate questions about how intellectual property policies have influenced scientific discovery and the spread of scientific discovery (commercialization, communication, etc). The US patent system is supposed to "promote the progress of science and useful arts;" does it? – Colin McFaul Feb 18 '14 at 18:11
@Jack M, the relationship between the patent system and scientific discovery is much more direct than the relationship between the paper industry and scientific discovery. – Colin McFaul Feb 18 '14 at 18:12
show 3 more improvement suggestions
up vote 1 down vote
Do historians of mathematics have to contend with the quality of the Latin in academic texts? (Where) Is this discussed in the literature?
added by Andres Caicedo Feb 22 '14 at 3:56
link
I don't understand what you mean by "quality"? – Jack M Feb 22 '14 at 8:22
1  
Do we have examples of important texts in Latin with serious grammatical mistakes or other infelicities, or perhaps too stiff or idiosyncratic? Is this more common than not? Does this make translation or understanding harder? – Andres Caicedo Feb 22 '14 at 8:43
up vote 1 down vote
where is slate w/( calculation for the cyclotomic) & pipe to Wolfgang Bolyai, who preserved it." is Location known today?
added by Pat B Feb 23 '14 at 13:56
link
2  
The way you state your question now, it is impossible to guess what you mean. (It is not even grammatical.) Could you please express yourself more clearly? – rem Feb 23 '14 at 15:46
1  
Maybe: "Where is the slate on which Gauss made the discovery of the 17-gon, and the pipe that he gave to Bolyai as a souvenir? Is its location known today?" That is 147 characters, 3 below the character limit. – J. W. Perry Feb 24 '14 at 18:28
up vote 1 down vote
Historical quotation search: Equations/formulae in (Latin?) prose, before modern symbolic notation
added by Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine Feb 24 '14 at 19:12
link
I’ve just posted a full version of this question on Mathoverflow. I would have waited to ask it here when this hits beta, but I’m hoping to get an answer in time for a talk coming up fairly soon. – Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine Feb 24 '14 at 19:16
up vote 1 down vote
Is the description of Gauss and Humboldt in Kehlmann's Measuring the World historically accuarate or not?
added by Per Manne Feb 24 '14 at 21:35
link
up vote 1 down vote
When did physics texts start to teach Kepler's 3/2's power law as a result of Newton's 1/r^2 law of gravitation, rather than the other way around?
added by Colin McFaul Feb 25 '14 at 5:10
link
Newton derived the 1/r^2 form of his law of gravitation from Kepler's 3/2's power law. – Colin McFaul Feb 25 '14 at 5:10
up vote 1 down vote
Who first worked with Silicone polymers?
added by Confutus Feb 25 '14 at 20:45
link
up vote 1 down vote
Hawking mentions in ABHT that Newton remarked once that the famed apple act'lly DISTRACTED him from his lucubrations. Where did Newton write/say this?
added by J. H. S. Feb 25 '14 at 22:10
link
up vote 1 down vote
Is there any evidence that Leibniz and/or Newton were aware of previous work by Indian mathematicians towards the calculus?
added by arjafi Mar 4 '14 at 15:14
link
up vote 1 down vote
What is the oldest reference to any electricity (except atmospheric lighting)?
added by Dheerendra Mar 6 '14 at 18:48
link
Did you perhaps mean atmospheric lightning? – Jonathan Van Matre Apr 3 '14 at 16:50
up vote 1 down vote
Whose shoulders did Newton stand on?
added by TooTone Mar 7 '14 at 23:56
link
Newton "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." Whose work was vital for Principia and Calculus (and why)? – TooTone Mar 7 '14 at 23:58
up vote 1 down vote
Did the 1956 AI/cybernetics split in the US (& subsequent cybernetics defunding) cause the US to lag behind other nations significantly in the field?
added by Jonathan Van Matre Mar 28 '14 at 4:28
link
up vote 0 down vote
How has war influenced the development of cryptography?
added by frabala Feb 18 '14 at 11:21
link
Maybe a tad borderline, but I don't think I'd vote to close. – Jack M Feb 18 '14 at 11:28
Maybe this question isn't directly connected with the history of maths and science. But, cryptography is an application of mathematics and wars have to do a lot with history. – frabala Feb 18 '14 at 11:32
1  
And vice versa, history affects mathematics. Cryptanalyzing machines were constructed during wars. So, I guess wars have to do with the history of math. – frabala Feb 18 '14 at 11:44
@Jack M Borderline only in the fact that volumes of documentaries and much literature have been written on the subject. As stated, the question is very broad. This with some name drop focus like Turing, Enigma, and WW2 (one era) would bring it down to a level that is less than a big-list of answers, although focus on various other particular earlier eras (e.g. WW1, US civil war, Roman wars...) would be no less interesting. I find it quite historical and Mathematical in nature as historically mathematicians and human computers did pretty much all of this work. I share your initial hesitation. – J. W. Perry Feb 19 '14 at 4:19
2  
I think "wars and the course they took" steers this question in the History.SE direction. A similar question aimed more in the direction of this site might be: "How has war influenced the development of cryptography? Has it caused the study of certain areas to be overemphasized, or others to be neglected?" In other words, put the focus on the scientific history, not the geopolitical history. – Jonathan Van Matre Mar 22 '14 at 4:03
show 1 more improvement suggestion
up vote 0 down vote
Did Occam’s razor ever “fail”, i.e., did it “reject” a theory that turned out to be a better description of reality later?
added by Wrzlprmft Feb 18 '14 at 17:36
link
Because somebody is bound to misunderstand it: Quotation marks denote ‘for lack of a better word”. – Wrzlprmft Feb 18 '14 at 18:02
1  
Maybe too broad since the only forms of Ockham's razor with anything more than a nice platitudinous sound have a tendency to produce wildly different "judgments" about a given theory. The basic idea of "simpler theory is better (or, more likely to be true)" would have to be spelled out more. What is the relevant sort of simplicity? Fewest posited/theoretical entities? Ideological simplicity? Something else? The question might be fine with some specification (like would be put in the body of a real question). – Dennis Feb 19 '14 at 4:07
1  
@Dennis: Yes, I some specification is definetely necessary about this question. Considering the razor itself, I thought about the criterion that it was reasonably invoked in historical scientific dispute (not necessarily by name). – Wrzlprmft Feb 19 '14 at 7:56
@Dennis I was going to say that the trouble is that Occam's razor is just a sort of philosophical rule of thumb, not exactly something a scientist would invoke explicitly in a peer reviewed paper ("And so, by Occam's razor, we have..."). But that's more of an answer to the question than a reason to close it. – Jack M Feb 19 '14 at 10:03
up vote 0 down vote
What led to Einsteinian relativity "winning out" over its Lorentzian rival?
added by Dennis Feb 19 '14 at 4:02
link
I lack the physics background to understand this question, but I like it. – Jack M Feb 22 '14 at 8:22
up vote 0 down vote
Why did mathematicians struggle to understand multiplying more than three numbers?
added by Brian Rushton Feb 19 '14 at 17:10
link
Proposed by Jack M. – Brian Rushton Feb 19 '14 at 17:13
This is a good question iff its presupposition is correct. Did Jack M. give any references for the idea that mathematicians did ever struggle with this? – Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine Feb 24 '14 at 19:24
@PLL There's a quote by Cardano specifically saying that the concept is absurd, and Viete in his New Algebra devoted pages to developing a theory of multiplying more than three numbers. I believe Descartes also spent quite a bit of time in his Geometrie making sense of the issue. The root of the problem was that multiplication was conceived of geometrically. – Jack M Feb 27 '14 at 11:11
up vote 0 down vote
What was said in the original 1699/1700 decision to introduce the New (Gregorian) Calendar Style in Sweden?
added by MathsBooks Feb 21 '14 at 12:21
link
There are two contradictory versions of what was planned. 1st Version: Skip all 11 leap days from 1700 to 1740. 2nd Version: Skip the leap day 1700, then 7 days in November 1700, and finally drop the leap days in 1704, 1708 and 1712. That what had historically happened was a third version: The leap day 29 February was omitted in 1700 and no further reductions were made. This led to the 'Swedish Calendar'. In January 1711 Sweden turned back to the Old Style. An extra day -a unique 30 February- was added in 1712. In 1753 Sweden introduced the New Style, 17 February being followed by 1 March. – MathsBooks Feb 21 '14 at 12:36
1  
How is this related to science? – Jack M Feb 22 '14 at 8:23
2  
I think, this is related to a general interest in the context of the introduction of the new calender style in Europe, where great mathematicians were involved in! – MathsBooks Feb 24 '14 at 10:09
up vote 0 down vote
What is known about the mathematics of the ancient civilizations of South-East Asia, such as the Khmer empire?
added by Per Manne Feb 24 '14 at 22:23
link
up vote 0 down vote
Are there unequivocal criteria to name institutions (e.g. universities) important centers of mathematical research, from a historical perspective?
added by MathsBooks Feb 25 '14 at 10:56
link
up vote 0 down vote
What is thought to be the earliest clear explanation of the hydrologic cycle?
added by Confutus Feb 25 '14 at 21:10
link
up vote 0 down vote
Who were some prominent early entomologists, and what were their contributions? science
added by Confutus Feb 25 '14 at 21:40
link
up vote 0 down vote
Are there any points in common in Newton's and Leibniz's development of the Calculus or are their approaches totally different from each other?
added by J. H. S. Feb 25 '14 at 21:57
link
up vote 0 down vote
When/where did meetings and conferences first begin to become popular venues for disseminating one's research?
added by delete Feb 26 '14 at 3:23
link
up vote 0 down vote
What is the first development in mathematics without any known or suspected application to science or the real wrold (at the time of its invention)?
added by BMS Feb 26 '14 at 4:53
link
Is there a better way to phrase this? I want to get at a development in math that was entirely "thought up," without science being an external motivation. Basically, mathematics for the sake of mathematics. – BMS Feb 26 '14 at 4:54
1  
@BMS: How about “mathematics without any known or suspected application (at the time of its invention)”? – Wrzlprmft Feb 26 '14 at 10:16
up vote 0 down vote
What are some examples of theorems/lemmas attributed to someone who is not its discoverer or discovered it after it was already known?
added by kan Feb 26 '14 at 19:17
link
Perhaps too broad but I think this question is interesting if we restrict ourselves to just one area of Mathematics, for example. – kan Feb 26 '14 at 19:18
1  
Here you can find plenty of them: mathoverflow.net/questions/24132/… – J. H. S. Mar 6 '14 at 0:14
up vote 0 down vote
why were Galois's ideas rejected by his contemporaries?
added by Lost1 Feb 26 '14 at 23:29
link
Maybe a wording not presupposing things would help: "Were Galois's ideas rejected by his contemporaries; and if so, why?" – GEdgar Mar 22 '14 at 19:13
up vote 0 down vote
Why are uppercase greek math symbols traditionally not set in italics?
added by Wrzlprmft Mar 2 '14 at 11:07
link
Inspired by why are math fonts (traditionally) italic/slant? and Greek non-italic?. – Wrzlprmft Mar 2 '14 at 11:07
up vote 0 down vote
What is the difference between the concept of logical truth as used in the works of Frege and Russell and the concept of valid formula in e.g.Godel ?
added by Mauro ALLEGRANZA Mar 8 '14 at 14:34
link
prev 1 2 3 next

This site has

Launched!

This Stack Exchange site's beta was successful, so it launched 7 months ago.

proposed by

Jack M
53.5k●28●239●507

8 years ago

edited by

Robert Cartaino ♦ 3
230k●71●662●1456

8 years ago

viewed

17,011 times

latest activity

7 years ago

followers

users also following

16.7% Mathematics Educa...
8.3% Worldbuilding
7.7% Mythology
7.1% Economics
23.7% only this proposal

followers active in

50.6% Mathematics
45.5% Stack Overflow
26.3% Physics
24.4% History of Scienc...
23.7% Meta Stack Exchange
22.4% Academia

recent followers

added Nov 3 '14 at 22:03
Alexander Konovalov
8,291●2●36●124
added Oct 28 '14 at 20:51
King Shimkus
10.5k●9●74●137
added Oct 21 '14 at 0:30
HDE 226868 ♦ 3
247k●74●937●1891
added Oct 20 '14 at 21:21
Danu ♦ 1
22.3k●12●112●201
added Oct 20 '14 at 16:00
Awesomehaircut
51●1
added Oct 14 '14 at 7:50
Joe
10.3k●13●88●152
added Oct 13 '14 at 19:49
Feral Oink
20.4k●7●150●424
added Oct 12 '14 at 10:51
krismath
6,588●10●72●157
added Oct 9 '14 at 15:45
user291957
2,641●1●18●57
added Sep 30 '14 at 1:32
karvens
3,831●16●35
added Sep 28 '14 at 2:43
golfer9338
562●4●12
added Sep 25 '14 at 15:28
Wooble
99.1k●17●188●288
added Sep 7 '14 at 16:23
soumyadeep
678●10●23
added Aug 18 '14 at 6:34
Lucas Zanella
2,853●3●36●92
added Aug 13 '14 at 19:14
Will Orrick
22.8k●2●75●129
added Jul 9 '14 at 15:23
Kyle Challis
1,980●3●15●50
added Jul 9 '14 at 2:24
PatoCriollo
9,299●1●27●51
added Jun 14 '14 at 16:40
Yashbhatt
3,373●8●30●75
added Jun 6 '14 at 0:03
Andrew Grimm
254k●194●1023●2268
added May 25 '14 at 7:34
Claudia
1,604●1●13●42
added May 22 '14 at 6:14
Noein
2,722●4●21●73
added May 19 '14 at 10:15
They call me Trinity
2,399●1●14●43
added May 13 '14 at 15:37
wpenton
123●5
added Apr 30 '14 at 15:24
user107644
51●1
added Apr 30 '14 at 8:00
user31782
18.2k●37●194●418
added Apr 25 '14 at 21:54
TRiG is Timothy Richard Green
53.5k●19●344●923
added Apr 23 '14 at 4:45
Vector
30.4k●16●146●335
added Apr 23 '14 at 3:07
naught101
51.8k●42●337●696
added Apr 20 '14 at 9:29
Hunan Rostomyan
10.3k●5●67●112
added Apr 19 '14 at 21:25
Grigory M
24.2k●9●134●234
added Apr 16 '14 at 11:33
anotherwise
54●2
added Apr 16 '14 at 9:20
user106966
51●1
added Apr 15 '14 at 21:23
user143398
51●1
added Apr 15 '14 at 17:32
biogirl
10.6k●22●81●167
added Apr 15 '14 at 15:50
gerrit ♦ 1
304k●144●1226●2603
added Apr 15 '14 at 14:51
Bhisham Sharma
91●4
added Apr 15 '14 at 14:19
DJClayworth
342k●87●953●1484
added Apr 14 '14 at 13:41
Pallavi
51●2
added Apr 13 '14 at 9:03
Cthulhubutt
834●4●14
added Apr 13 '14 at 7:46
Wolfgang Krauss
51●1
feed icon proposal feed
faq | blog | legal | privacy policy | contact us | feedback always welcome
site design / logo © 2022 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa; see the licensing help page for more information.
rev 2022.8.4.601