Area 51 » Science

264

followers

81 Example Questions (4 closed)

active newest votes

up vote 0 down vote

added by j4rey89 May 4 '16 at 13:21

up vote 0 down vote

added by Pacerier May 4 '16 at 13:20

up vote 0 down vote

added by enedil May 1 '16 at 18:06

up vote 0 down vote

added by enedil May 1 '16 at 18:04

up vote 0 down vote

added by enedil May 1 '16 at 18:03

up vote 0 down vote

added by Yisela Apr 29 '16 at 12:53

I don't think I expressed this one very well, but the question is something like: "Should AIs mutate randomly?" – Yisela Apr 29 '16 at 12:57

up vote 0 down vote

added by Yisela Apr 29 '16 at 12:51

up vote 0 down vote

added by Yisela Apr 29 '16 at 12:50

up vote 0 down vote

added by Yisela Apr 29 '16 at 12:50

up vote 0 down vote

added by Yisela Apr 29 '16 at 12:45

up vote 3 down vote

added by KKZiomek Apr 28 '16 at 2:54

up vote 0 down vote

added by wizzwizz2 Apr 26 '16 at 17:43

You could use a machine-learning algorithm to interface with the NAO robot, I suppose, but the NAO robot is just a robot. Any software running on it is not the NAO robot, but is a program interfacing with the NAO robot. aldebaran.com/en/cool-robots/nao – wizzwizz4 Apr 26 '16 at 18:03

On the other hand, many people use the term "robot" to refer to software and algorithms without any physical form (see "chatterbots" as an example). Those software and algorithms can be said to be 'artificial intelligence'. It's possible that people "assume" that if an algorithm is intelligent, it is therefore a bot. But probably not the other way around (an actual "robot" is not intelligent). – Tariq Ali Apr 28 '16 at 12:15

up vote 2 down vote

added by nsandersen Apr 16 '16 at 14:53

(I think it is a question of how complicated code/logic and at what future point.) – nsandersen Apr 16 '16 at 14:54

up vote 1 down vote

added by Matt Carmona G Apr 15 '16 at 2:20

up vote 0 down vote

added by ratchet freak Apr 12 '16 at 13:24

I'll grant that "complex" is under-defined here. Especially because how little you need for turing completeness. – ratchet freak Apr 12 '16 at 13:25

Maybe fix the question to be "How large would a neural net need to be to be turing-complete?" – Tariq Ali Apr 13 '16 at 13:02

up vote 0 down vote

added by lucvoo Apr 10 '16 at 17:45

up vote 10 down vote

added by Tariq Ali Apr 10 '16 at 16:30

	Frustration: Fast duplicated input? :) – nsandersen Apr 16 '16 at 14:57
	Boredom: Repeatedly inputting nonsensical input, such as "What would wood do?" – wizzwizz4 Apr 27 '16 at 19:14
	When I proposed the question, I was imagining the answer to only refer to visual identification of emotion (such as Microsoft's "Emotion API"). Thinking about how chatterbots could identify emotional states would be a very interesting problem and one that I haven't thought about. I'm actually wondering whether this question is too vague, since there can be many different types of AIs, each being able to detect emotions in multiple ways. – Tariq Ali Apr 27 '16 at 22:47

up vote 6 down vote

added by Tariq Ali Apr 10 '16 at 16:12

up vote 0 down vote

added by enedil Apr 9 '16 at 19:30

up vote 1 down vote

added by rnrneverdies Apr 7 '16 at 23:39

up vote 1 down vote

added by Nathan Apr 6 '16 at 23:22

up vote 0 down vote

added by SF. Apr 5 '16 at 9:43

up vote 0 down vote

added by rcpinto Apr 4 '16 at 0:42

up vote 1 down vote

added by rcpinto Apr 4 '16 at 0:41

up vote 0 down vote

added by rcpinto Apr 4 '16 at 0:40

up vote 0 down vote

added by rcpinto Apr 4 '16 at 0:39

up vote 0 down vote

added by Alberto Apr 2 '16 at 16:23

up vote -2 down vote

added by x-x Apr 1 '16 at 20:57

up vote 1 down vote

added by x-x Mar 31 '16 at 1:52

closed as not a real question by Robert Cartaino Apr 8 '16 at 15:29

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form.