Area 51 » Technology

147

followers

Announcements

Should this proposal be called "Beta Testers" or "Code Review?" I think of beta testers as customers who know the program might be incomplete or contain errors, but who want to try it anyway and offer feedback and bug reports. Beta testers seldom see actual code, and are not programmers, whereas a code review involves reviewing code with other programmers. – Robert Harvey Jul 6 '10 at 14:54

I'm confused, is it a Q&A site? Or is it a Beta Tester recruitment site? – rlb.usa Jul 6 '10 at 17:03

Apoloigse, "Code Review" would be a more descriptive title to what this proposal is concerning, the basic point of a this proposal is to be able to detailed reviews on your Design Patter, Application UI, Security etc. – RobertPitt Jul 7 '10 at 8:14

show 16 more announcements

11 Closed Questions (show all)

active newest votes

up vote 2 down vote

added by Larry Smithmier Jul 6 '10 at 16:35

closed as off topic by Jeff, Asa Ayers, Wes, Georges Duplessy, Edgar Nov 23 '10 at 0:50

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

Code or Screenshots would make this question on-topic. Merely giving a url without context, or introducing an extra step to (email me for credentials) should be frowned upon. – Kyle Trauberman Dec 20 '10 at 22:49

Updated per comment. I believe I retained the original feel but addressed the concerns Kyle raised. – Larry Smithmier Dec 22 '10 at 0:02

on-topic :) SPACE – DarkLightA Dec 22 '10 at 10:23

I also think this might be on-topic – Felix Dombek Dec 24 '10 at 2:19

Taking it back to the original off topic example. Sorry, I was trying to make it on topic for some reason. – Larry Smithmier Dec 26 '10 at 2:53

up vote 1 down vote

added by Julio Guerra Nov 23 '10 at 0:53

closed as off topic by Zayne S Halsall, The Josenator, Stefan H, david4dev, Martin Dec 27 '10 at 0:41

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

up vote 0 down vote

added by Joe Jul 6 '10 at 15:31

closed as off topic by Aiden Bell, Jeff, Mr_Qqn, Larry Smithmier, Asa Ayers Oct 1 '10 at 17:26

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

Off topic i'd say. More a SO question than a 'test and feedback' question – Aiden Bell Jul 6 '10 at 19:52

up vote 0 down vote

added by Gordon Gustafson Dec 16 '10 at 20:23

closed as off topic by Stingervz, The Josenator, Felix Dombek, Kyle Trauberman, Xavier Nodet Dec 21 '10 at 22:22

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

Better for StackOverflow. – Kyle Trauberman Dec 20 '10 at 22:50

up vote 0 down vote

added by Gordon Gustafson Dec 16 '10 at 20:26

closed as off topic by Stingervz, The Josenator, Klaim, Tommy Persson, Xavier Nodet Dec 21 '10 at 22:24

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

up vote 0 down vote

added by Gordon Gustafson Dec 20 '10 at 13:59

closed as off topic by Kyle Trauberman, Visionary Software Solutions, jan.vdbergh, the_drow, nocley Dec 22 '10 at 15:53

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

up vote 0 down vote

added by david4dev Dec 20 '10 at 23:56

closed as off topic by Jake, Tommy Persson, Visionary Software Solutions, jan.vdbergh, DarkLightA Dec 22 '10 at 10:22

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

up vote -1 down vote

added by Wes Nov 4 '10 at 14:12

closed as off topic by AviD, jcolebrand, Josh, Georges Duplessy, Edgar Nov 23 '10 at 0:50

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

up vote -1 down vote

added by Gordon Gustafson Dec 16 '10 at 20:24

closed as off topic by Stingervz, Felix Dombek, Kyle Trauberman, Anthony Pegram, Xavier Nodet Dec 21 '10 at 22:25

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

up vote -2 down vote

added by Aiden Bell Jul 6 '10 at 19:54

closed as off topic by Jeff, Mr_Qqn, Wes, Larry Smithmier, Asa Ayers Oct 1 '10 at 17:26

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

up vote -4 down vote

added by Wes Nov 4 '10 at 14:11

closed as off topic by jcolebrand, Kaji, Zayne S Halsall, albert green, doppelgreener Dec 16 '10 at 2:30

This question does not relate to the topic of the proposal.
It was closed as part of an automated migration of off-topic to close votes on September 29, 2011.

I'm hoping this is off topic – Wes Nov 4 '10 at 14:11

I can't decide between OT and NAGE. Do we really expect this sort of thing to show up? – Pops Nov 22 '10 at 20:06

I think it's too subjective and argumentative for any SE site. – Josh Nov 22 '10 at 20:07

Possibly I was just trying to come up with an example question – Wes Nov 22 '10 at 20:13

@Josh: It would be perfect on Programmers.SE, with an edit: "Are closures a bad idea?". The presumption is left for the question body where the asker can say "I have read that closures are X etc." – doppelgreener Dec 16 '10 at 2:32